meeting: is gosh difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents forum
Weight: 0.70
, topic
Weight: 0.66
, demonstration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.60
Siblings hearing
Weight: 0.67
, gathering
Weight: 0.67
, visit
Weight: 0.64
, encounter
Weight: 0.63
, retreat
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
is gosh difficult 1.00
is gosh darn difficult 0.96
is gosh expensive 0.95
is gosh darn expensive 0.92
is darn difficult 0.85
be really freaking slow 0.82
is difficult 0.79
is darn expensive 0.78
be really freaking connecting 0.77
is hard 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(event, be really freaking connecting)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(meeting, is gosh difficult)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(event, be really freaking slow)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(meeting, is gosh difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(event, be really freaking slow)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(event, be really freaking connecting)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(event, be really freaking slow)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(event, be really freaking connecting)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(event, be really freaking connecting)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(meeting, is gosh difficult)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(event, be really freaking slow)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(meeting, is gosh difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hearing, is hard)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(hearing, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(meeting, is gosh difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(meeting, is darn difficult)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(meeting, is difficult)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(meeting, is hard)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(meeting, is darn difficult)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(meeting, is difficult)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(meeting, is darn difficult)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(meeting, is difficult)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(meeting, is hard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is darn difficult)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is difficult)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(meeting, is hard)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is gosh difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(meeting, is gosh difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(event, be really freaking slow)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(event, be really freaking connecting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hearing, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(event, be really freaking slow)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(meeting, is gosh difficult)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(event, be really freaking connecting)