melbourne: has state transport

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.61
, port
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, new zealand
Weight: 0.55
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.35
, manchester
Weight: 0.35
, sydney
Weight: 0.34
, tasmania
Weight: 0.34
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state transport 1.00
is public transport 0.92
is transport expensive 0.90
is public transport expensive 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(sydney, has state transport)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sydney, is public transport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(sydney, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sydney, has state transport)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(sydney, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sydney, is public transport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(melbourne, has state transport)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(melbourne, is public transport)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(melbourne, is public transport)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is transport expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is public transport expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(melbourne, is public transport)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(melbourne, is transport expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(melbourne, is public transport expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(melbourne, is public transport expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(melbourne, is transport expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(melbourne, is public transport expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(melbourne, is transport expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is public transport)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, has state transport)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(melbourne, has state transport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sydney, has state transport)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, has state transport)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sydney, is public transport)