melbourne: is transport expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.61
, port
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, new zealand
Weight: 0.55
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.35
, manchester
Weight: 0.35
, sydney
Weight: 0.34
, tasmania
Weight: 0.34
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is transport expensive 1.00
is public transport expensive 0.95
has state transport 0.90
is public transport 0.89
is expensive 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(sydney, has state transport)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sydney, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sydney, is public transport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(sydney, is public transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sydney, is public transport)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(sydney, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sydney, has state transport)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(brisbane, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(brisbane, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(sydney, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sydney, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(melbourne, is transport expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(melbourne, is public transport)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(melbourne, has state transport)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(melbourne, has state transport)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(melbourne, has state transport)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(melbourne, is public transport)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(melbourne, is public transport expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(melbourne, is public transport expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(melbourne, is public transport)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(melbourne, is public transport expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, has state transport)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is public transport expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(melbourne, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(melbourne, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(melbourne, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is public transport)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is transport expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(melbourne, is transport expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sydney, is public transport)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sydney, has state transport)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(brisbane, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is transport expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sydney, is expensive)