melbourne: was founded

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.61
, port
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, new zealand
Weight: 0.55
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.35
, manchester
Weight: 0.35
, sydney
Weight: 0.34
, tasmania
Weight: 0.34
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was founded 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new zealand, was founded)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(melbourne, was founded)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(melbourne, was founded)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, was founded)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, was founded)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, was founded)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new zealand, was founded)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(melbourne, was founded)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(melbourne, was founded)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(melbourne, was founded)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(liverpool, was founded)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(liverpool, was founded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(melbourne, was founded)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(melbourne, was founded)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(melbourne, was founded)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(melbourne, was founded)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, was founded)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(melbourne, was founded)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(melbourne, was founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, was founded)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new zealand, was founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, was founded)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(liverpool, was founded)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(melbourne, was founded)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new zealand, was founded)