member: be on fantage mean

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents family member
Weight: 0.89
, representative
Weight: 0.68
, constituent
Weight: 0.62
, vice president
Weight: 0.62
Siblings observer
Weight: 0.69
, chairman
Weight: 0.68
, chairperson
Weight: 0.66
, chief
Weight: 0.65
, owner
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on fantage mean 1.00
mean 0.96
be on fantage 0.81
do 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(constituent, mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(member, be on fantage mean)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(representative, mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(member, be on fantage mean)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(representative, mean)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(constituent, mean)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(representative, mean)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(constituent, mean)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(observer, do)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(constituent, mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(member, be on fantage mean)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(representative, mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(member, be on fantage mean)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(observer, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(observer, do)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(member, be on fantage mean)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(member, mean)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(member, mean)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(member, mean)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(member, mean)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(member, be on fantage)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(member, be on fantage)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(member, be on fantage)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(member, be on fantage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(member, be on fantage mean)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(member, be on fantage mean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(constituent, mean)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(representative, mean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(observer, do)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(constituent, mean)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(member, be on fantage mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(representative, mean)