membrane: has state potential

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.64
, layer
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
Siblings amniotic fluid
Weight: 0.63
, ethylene oxide
Weight: 0.36
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, dna molecule
Weight: 0.35
, resin
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state potential 1.00
is potential important 0.90
is potential negative 70 0.85
is potential negative 0.85
is potential maintained 0.82
has state problem 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(polyethylene, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(polyethylene, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(polyethylene, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(membrane, has state potential)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(membrane, is potential important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(membrane, is potential important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(membrane, is potential important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(membrane, is potential maintained)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(membrane, is potential negative)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(membrane, is potential negative)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(membrane, is potential negative 70)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(membrane, is potential negative 70)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(membrane, is potential maintained)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(membrane, is potential negative)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(membrane, is potential negative 70)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(membrane, is potential negative 70)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(membrane, is potential negative)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(membrane, is potential maintained)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(membrane, is potential important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(membrane, is potential maintained)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(membrane, has state potential)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(membrane, has state potential)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(membrane, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(polyethylene, has state problem)