memory: be important in computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flash memory
Weight: 0.82
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.63
, vision
Weight: 0.62
, buffer
Weight: 0.53
Siblings random access memory
Weight: 0.74
, disk
Weight: 0.62
, forget
Weight: 0.35
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, personal computer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in computer 1.00
be important to computer 1.00
be in computer 0.96
is computer 0.95
be needed in computer 0.93
is popular computer 0.92
be required in computer 0.90
is most popular computer 0.89
be low on computer 0.88
be callled computer 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(personal computer, is popular computer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(personal computer, is most popular computer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(personal computer, is computer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(personal computer, be callled computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(personal computer, is computer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(personal computer, is computer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(personal computer, be callled computer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(personal computer, be callled computer)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(personal computer, is popular computer)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(personal computer, is popular computer)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(personal computer, is most popular computer)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(personal computer, is most popular computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(memory, be important in computer)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(memory, be important to computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(memory, be important to computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(memory, be important to computer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(memory, be important to computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(memory, be needed in computer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(memory, be low on computer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(memory, be needed in computer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(memory, be needed in computer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(memory, be required in computer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(memory, be needed in computer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(memory, be required in computer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(memory, be low on computer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(memory, be required in computer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(memory, be required in computer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(memory, be low on computer)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(memory, be low on computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(memory, be important in computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(memory, be important in computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(personal computer, is computer)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(personal computer, be callled computer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(personal computer, is popular computer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(memory, be important in computer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(personal computer, is most popular computer)