menopause: has state concern

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents female reproductive system
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.53
Siblings menstruation
Weight: 0.34
, hypothyroidism
Weight: 0.34
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.34
, lupus
Weight: 0.34
, puberty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state concern 1.00
generate concern 0.86
has state problem 0.84
generate concern among animals 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(menopause, has state concern)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(event, generate concern among animals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(menopause, has state concern)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(event, generate concern among animals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(event, generate concern among animals)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(puberty, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hypothyroidism, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(menopause, has state concern)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(event, generate concern among animals)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(menopause, has state concern)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(hypothyroidism, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hypothyroidism, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(puberty, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(puberty, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(menopause, has state concern)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has state concern)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(menopause, has state concern)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(event, generate concern among animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(puberty, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hypothyroidism, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(menopause, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(event, generate concern among animals)