menu: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents icon
Weight: 0.60
, section
Weight: 0.59
, code
Weight: 0.57
, detail
Weight: 0.57
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.65
, zip code
Weight: 0.32
, sidebar
Weight: 0.31
, line item
Weight: 0.31
, layout
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality stuff 0.82
were bad 0.81
has quality costs 0.76
be good for people 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(code, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(menu, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(icon, has quality stuff)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(menu, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(code, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(menu, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(menu, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(code, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(code, were bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(code, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(icon, has quality stuff)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(code, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(code, were bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(code, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(icon, has quality stuff)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, be good for people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(code, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(menu, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(code, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(menu, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(icon, has quality stuff)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(menu, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(menu, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(breakfast, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(breakfast, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(breakfast, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(breakfast, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(line item, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(line item, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(breakfast, be good for people)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(breakfast, be good for people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(menu, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(menu, has quality costs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(menu, has quality costs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(menu, has quality costs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(menu, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(code, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(code, were bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(code, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(icon, has quality stuff)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(breakfast, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(breakfast, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(line item, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(breakfast, be good for people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(code, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(code, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(code, were bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(menu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(icon, has quality stuff)