menu: has quality costs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents icon
Weight: 0.60
, section
Weight: 0.59
, code
Weight: 0.57
, detail
Weight: 0.57
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.65
, zip code
Weight: 0.32
, sidebar
Weight: 0.31
, line item
Weight: 0.31
, layout
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality costs 1.00
has quality good 0.76
has quality bad 0.76
have two prices 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(code, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(menu, has quality costs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(code, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(menu, has quality costs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(code, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(code, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(code, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(code, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(code, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(menu, has quality costs)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(code, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(menu, has quality costs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(breakfast, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(breakfast, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(breakfast, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(breakfast, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(line item, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(line item, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(menu, has quality costs)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(menu, have two prices)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(menu, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(menu, have two prices)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(menu, have two prices)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(menu, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(menu, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(menu, have two prices)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(menu, has quality costs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(code, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(code, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(breakfast, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(breakfast, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(line item, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(code, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(menu, has quality costs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(code, has quality good)