merger: has quality news

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deal
Weight: 0.69
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, matter
Weight: 0.59
, development
Weight: 0.59
, agreement
Weight: 0.59
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.36
, takeover
Weight: 0.34
, partnership
Weight: 0.33
, incorporation
Weight: 0.32
, bankruptcy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality news 1.00
is latest news 0.86
has quality bad 0.80
has quality good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(merger, has quality news)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(deal, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(merger, has quality news)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(merger, has quality news)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(deal, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(deal, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(bankruptcy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(incorporation, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(takeover, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(takeover, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(partnership, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(merger, has quality news)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(deal, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(merger, has quality news)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(merger, has quality news)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(partnership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(partnership, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(bankruptcy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(bankruptcy, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(takeover, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(takeover, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(takeover, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(takeover, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(acquisition, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(acquisition, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(acquisition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(acquisition, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(incorporation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(incorporation, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(merger, has quality news)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(merger, is latest news)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(merger, is latest news)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(merger, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(merger, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(merger, is latest news)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(merger, is latest news)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(merger, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(merger, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(merger, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(merger, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(merger, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(deal, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(bankruptcy, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(partnership, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(acquisition, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(takeover, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(takeover, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(acquisition, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(incorporation, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(deal, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(merger, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)