merger: have free tax

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deal
Weight: 0.69
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, matter
Weight: 0.59
, development
Weight: 0.59
, agreement
Weight: 0.59
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.36
, takeover
Weight: 0.34
, partnership
Weight: 0.33
, incorporation
Weight: 0.32
, bankruptcy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have free tax 1.00
have tax 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(merger, have free tax)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, have free tax)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(merger, have free tax)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, have tax)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(merger, have free tax)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(acquisition, have free tax)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(acquisition, have free tax)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(merger, have free tax)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(acquisition, have tax)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(acquisition, have tax)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(merger, have free tax)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(merger, have free tax)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(merger, have free tax)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(merger, have tax)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(merger, have free tax)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(merger, have tax)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(merger, have free tax)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(merger, have tax)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(merger, have free tax)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(merger, have tax)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(merger, have free tax)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(merger, have free tax)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(merger, have free tax)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(merger, have free tax)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(merger, have free tax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(merger, have free tax)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(acquisition, have free tax)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(merger, have free tax)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(acquisition, have tax)