:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Salient implies Plausible
0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(met, have pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(met, have pay)
Similarity expansion
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(met, have pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(met, pay bonilla)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(met, have pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(met, owe bonilla)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(met, have pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(met, pay bonilla)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(met, have pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(met, owe bonilla)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(met, have pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(met, pay bonilla)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(met, have pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(met, owe bonilla)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(met, have pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(met, pay bonilla)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(met, have pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(met, owe bonilla)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(met, have pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(met, have pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(met, have pay)
Typical implies Plausible
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(met, have pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(met, have pay)