met: owe bonilla

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, tv show
Weight: 0.54
, work
Weight: 0.49
, team
Weight: 0.48
, amino acid
Weight: 0.48
Siblings meet
Weight: 0.32
, talking
Weight: 0.32
, talk show
Weight: 0.32
, living thing
Weight: 0.32
, speaking
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
owe bonilla 1.00
owe bobby bonilla 0.80
have pay 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(met, owe bonilla)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(met, owe bonilla)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(met, owe bonilla)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(met, owe bobby bonilla)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(met, owe bonilla)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(met, have pay)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(met, owe bonilla)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(met, have pay)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(met, owe bonilla)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(met, owe bobby bonilla)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(met, owe bonilla)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(met, have pay)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(met, owe bonilla)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(met, owe bobby bonilla)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(met, owe bonilla)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(met, owe bobby bonilla)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(met, owe bonilla)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(met, have pay)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(met, owe bonilla)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(met, owe bonilla)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(met, owe bonilla)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(met, owe bonilla)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(met, owe bonilla)