metal: be better conductors than glass

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, hard rock
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beryllium
Weight: 0.72
, tantalum
Weight: 0.71
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, cobalt
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better conductors than glass 1.00
be better conductors than non-metals 0.95
is better conductors 0.93
be good for conductors 0.91
be good conductors of electrcity 0.91
is good conductors 0.90
be different from conductors 0.90
make good conductors 0.90
be better conductors than ceramics 0.90
make conductors 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(material, be different from conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(metal, be better conductors than glass)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(material, be different from conductors)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(material, be different from conductors)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(material, be different from conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(metal, be better conductors than glass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(metal, be better conductors than glass)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(metal, make good conductors)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(metal, make conductors)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(metal, is good conductors)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(metal, make conductors)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(metal, is good conductors)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(metal, make conductors)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(metal, make good conductors)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(metal, is good conductors)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(metal, make good conductors)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(metal, make conductors)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(metal, make good conductors)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(metal, is good conductors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(metal, be better conductors than glass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(metal, be better conductors than glass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(material, be different from conductors)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(metal, be better conductors than glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(material, be different from conductors)