metal: be good conductor of electricity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, hard rock
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beryllium
Weight: 0.72
, tantalum
Weight: 0.71
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, cobalt
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good conductor of electricity 1.00
be best conductor of electricity 0.98
be good conductors of electricity 0.94
be better conductors of electricity 0.93
be bad conductors of electricity 0.93
be very good conductors of electricity 0.93
be such good conductors of electricity 0.93
be conductors of electricity 0.92
be such as caesium good conductors of electricity 0.92
be such great conductors of electricity 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(metal, be good conductor of electricity)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductors of electricity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(metal, be good conductors of electricity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(metal, be very good conductors of electricity)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(metal, be very good conductors of electricity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(metal, be such good conductors of electricity)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(metal, be good conductors of electricity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductors of electricity)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(metal, be such good conductors of electricity)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(metal, be very good conductors of electricity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(metal, be such good conductors of electricity)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(metal, be very good conductors of electricity)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(metal, be such good conductors of electricity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of electricity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of electricity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)