metal: is good conductors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, hard rock
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beryllium
Weight: 0.72
, tantalum
Weight: 0.71
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, cobalt
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good conductors 1.00
be good conductors of electrcity 1.00
be good for conductors 0.99
be called good conductors 0.99
make good conductors 0.98
is better conductors 0.98
is conductors 0.98
is best conductors 0.97
make conductors 0.97
be called conductors 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(material, is conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(metal, is good conductors)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(material, is conductors)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(material, is conductors)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(material, is conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(metal, is good conductors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(metal, is good conductors)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(metal, make good conductors)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(metal, is conductors)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(metal, make conductors)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(metal, make good conductors)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(metal, is conductors)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(metal, make conductors)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(metal, make good conductors)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(metal, is conductors)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(metal, make conductors)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(metal, make conductors)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(metal, is conductors)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(metal, make good conductors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(metal, is good conductors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(metal, is good conductors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(material, is conductors)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(metal, is good conductors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(material, is conductors)