meteorologist: depend heavily on computers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.72
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, specialist
Weight: 0.50
, most people
Weight: 0.46
, researcher
Weight: 0.45
Siblings biologist
Weight: 0.36
, economist
Weight: 0.36
, geologist
Weight: 0.36
, astronomer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
depend heavily on computers 1.00
use computers make 0.81
use computers 0.81
use high speed computers 0.79
use speed computers 0.78
use computer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(scientist, use computers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(scientist, use computer)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(scientist, use computers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(scientist, use computer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use computer)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use computers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use computers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(scientist, use computers)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(scientist, use computer)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(biologist, use computers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(biologist, use computers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(meteorologist, use computers make)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers make)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, use computers make)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(meteorologist, use computers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, use computer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, use computers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(meteorologist, use computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use computers make)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use computers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use computer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use high speed computers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, use high speed computers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(meteorologist, use high speed computers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use high speed computers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(scientist, use computers)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(scientist, use computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(biologist, use computers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(scientist, use computers)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(scientist, use computer)