method: act bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents approach
Weight: 0.72
, standard
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.61
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.69
, extraction
Weight: 0.67
, strategy
Weight: 0.67
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.66
, spray
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
act bad 1.00
act dangerous 0.87
be bad after all 0.77
is good thing 0.75
acting exactly work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(standard, be bad after all)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, act bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(standard, be bad after all)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(standard, be bad after all)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(standard, be bad after all)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(method, act bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(method, act bad)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(method, act dangerous)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(method, act dangerous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(method, act dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(method, act dangerous)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, acting exactly work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(method, acting exactly work)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(method, acting exactly work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(method, act bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, act bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(standard, be bad after all)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(method, act bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(standard, be bad after all)