method: is used more

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents approach
Weight: 0.72
, standard
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.61
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.69
, extraction
Weight: 0.67
, strategy
Weight: 0.67
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.66
, spray
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is used more 1.00
is used for 0.89
is is used 0.89
be used 0.88
have have used 0.83
is least used 0.83
be better than one 0.79
is more likely 0.79
make more money 0.79
is more efficient 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(option, is more likely) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tool, is used for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(option, make more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, is is used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tool, is is used)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tool, is used for)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tool, have have used)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(option, make more money)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(option, is more likely)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(option, make more money)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(option, is more likely)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tool, is used for)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tool, is is used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(extraction, is more efficient)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extraction, be better than one)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tool, is used for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(method, is used more)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, is is used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(method, is used more)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(method, is used more)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(option, is more likely) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(method, is used more)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(option, make more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(method, is used more)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(algorithm, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be used)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(extraction, be better than one)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(extraction, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(extraction, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(method, is used more)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(method, is least used)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(method, is least used)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(method, is least used)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(method, is least used)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tool, is is used)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tool, is used for)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tool, have have used)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(option, make more money)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(option, is more likely)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(algorithm, be used)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(extraction, be better than one)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(extraction, is more efficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tool, is is used)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tool, is used for)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tool, have have used)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(option, make more money)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(method, is used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(option, is more likely)