mexican restaurant: be at california

Related concepts

Parents	restaurant Weight: 0.74 , place Weight: 0.59 , thing Weight: 0.52 , favorite Weight: 0.51
Siblings	italian restaurant Weight: 0.42 , chinese restaurant Weight: 0.41 , french restaurant Weight: 0.40 , indian restaurant Weight: 0.40 , seafood restaurant Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at california	1.00
be at southern california	0.92
be at michigan	0.80
be at texas	0.80
be at mexico	0.80
be at seattle	0.77
be at chicago	0.76
be at india	0.76
be at boston	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be at california)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at southern california)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be at southern california)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at southern california)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at southern california)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at texas)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be at texas)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at texas)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at texas)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at india)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at seattle)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at boston)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)