mexican restaurant: be at san diego

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, place
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, favorite
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at san diego 1.00
be used to eat italian fook 0.81
be at montreal 0.76
be used to lspaeking spanish 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at montreal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat italian fook)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat italian fook)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat italian fook)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at montreal)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at montreal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to lspaeking spanish)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to lspaeking spanish)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to lspaeking spanish)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to lspaeking spanish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat italian fook)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at montreal)