mexican restaurant: be at southern california

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, place
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, favorite
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at southern california 1.00
be at california 0.92
be at mexico 0.76
be at michigan 0.75
be at texas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be at southern california)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be at california)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at california)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at texas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be at texas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at texas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at texas)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at southern california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at southern california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at southern california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)