mexican restaurant: be used to eat polenta

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, place
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, favorite
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to eat polenta 1.00
be used to eat pasta 0.89
be used to eat lasagna 0.88
be used to eat calamari 0.87
be used to eat linguini 0.86
be used to enjoy pasta 0.86
has pasta dish on menu 0.85
serve garlic bread 0.85
use duck fat to saute vegetable 0.84
be used to eat fajitas 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be used to eat calamari)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, serve garlic bread)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat linguini)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(italian restaurant, serve garlic bread)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, serve garlic bread)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat linguini)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat linguini)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be used to eat calamari)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be used to eat calamari)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat fajitas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat fajitas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat fajitas)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat fajitas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat linguini)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be used to eat calamari)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, serve garlic bread)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)