mexican restaurant: be used to eat taco

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, place
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, favorite
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to eat taco 1.00
be used to eat fajitas 0.88
be used to eat pizza 0.86
be used to eat nacho 0.86
be used to eat mexican cuisine 0.83
be used to eat tasty food 0.83
be used to eat curry food 0.82
be used to eat pasta 0.81
be used to eat to have lunch 0.81
be used to eat spaghetti 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(place, be used to eat to have lunch)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat curry food)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat curry food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat curry food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat fajitas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat mexican cuisine)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat nacho)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat nacho)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat fajitas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat fajitas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat nacho)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat nacho)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat mexican cuisine)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat fajitas)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat mexican cuisine)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat mexican cuisine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to have lunch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat curry food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to have lunch)