mexican restaurant: has physical part plates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, place
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, favorite
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part plates 1.00
have hot plates 0.88
serve plates 0.86
serve hot plates 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(restaurant, serve hot plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(restaurant, serve hot plates)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, serve hot plates)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(restaurant, serve hot plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, serve plates)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, have hot plates)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, serve hot plates)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, serve plates)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, have hot plates)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, serve plates)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, serve hot plates)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, have hot plates)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, serve hot plates)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, serve plates)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, have hot plates)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, serve hot plates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, serve hot plates)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(mexican restaurant, has physical part plates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, serve hot plates)