mexico city: be more vulnerable to air pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.75
, city
Weight: 0.71
, place
Weight: 0.66
, country
Weight: 0.65
Siblings san francisco
Weight: 0.69
, guadalajara
Weight: 0.46
, quebec city
Weight: 0.40
, mexico
Weight: 0.39
, north america
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more vulnerable to air pollution 1.00
have air pollution 0.92
be affected by smog 0.81
is polluted 0.80
have smog 0.77
be more vulnerable to earthquakes 0.77
be vulnerable to activity 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(city, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(city, is polluted)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(city, is polluted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(city, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(mexico city, have air pollution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, have air pollution)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mexico city, have air pollution)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(mexico city, have air pollution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mexico city, be affected by smog)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, have smog)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(mexico city, is polluted)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be affected by smog)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is polluted)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mexico city, have smog)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(mexico city, is polluted)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be affected by smog)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mexico city, is polluted)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mexico city, be affected by smog)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(mexico city, have smog)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mexico city, have smog)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, is polluted)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, is polluted)