mexico city: be more vulnerable to earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.75
, city
Weight: 0.71
, place
Weight: 0.66
, country
Weight: 0.65
Siblings san francisco
Weight: 0.69
, guadalajara
Weight: 0.46
, quebec city
Weight: 0.40
, mexico
Weight: 0.39
, north america
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more vulnerable to earthquakes 1.00
be vulnerable to earthquakes 0.99
be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly 0.99
be susceptible to earthquakes 0.95
be prone to earthquakes 0.93
have earthquakes 0.91
have many earthquakes 0.91
was severely affected by earthquakes 0.85
be vulnerable to seismic activity 0.83
be vulnerable to activity 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have many earthquakes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(san francisco, have many earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have many earthquakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mexico city, have earthquakes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mexico city, have earthquakes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(mexico city, have earthquakes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, have earthquakes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(san francisco, have many earthquakes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)