mexico city: be vulnerable to seismic activity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.75
, city
Weight: 0.71
, place
Weight: 0.66
, country
Weight: 0.65
Siblings san francisco
Weight: 0.69
, guadalajara
Weight: 0.46
, quebec city
Weight: 0.40
, mexico
Weight: 0.39
, north america
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vulnerable to seismic activity 1.00
be vulnerable to activity 0.84
be vulnerable to earthquakes 0.83
be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly 0.83
be more vulnerable to earthquakes 0.83
be susceptible to earthquakes 0.80
be prone to earthquakes 0.79
have earthquakes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(mexico, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, have earthquakes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(mexico city, have earthquakes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mexico city, have earthquakes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mexico city, have earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to seismic activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)