mexico city: was severely affected by earthquakes

Related concepts

Parents	latin america Weight: 0.75 , city Weight: 0.71 , place Weight: 0.66 , country Weight: 0.65
Siblings	san francisco Weight: 0.69 , guadalajara Weight: 0.46 , quebec city Weight: 0.40 , mexico Weight: 0.39 , north america Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was severely affected by earthquakes	1.00
be vulnerable to earthquakes	0.85
be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly	0.85
be more vulnerable to earthquakes	0.85
have many earthquakes	0.84
be prone to earthquakes	0.83
have earthquakes	0.83
be susceptible to earthquakes	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have many earthquakes)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(mexico, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(san francisco, have many earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(san francisco, have many earthquakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(mexico city, have earthquakes)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(mexico city, have earthquakes)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(mexico city, have earthquakes)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, have earthquakes)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(san francisco, have many earthquakes)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(mexico city, was severely affected by earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)