mexico: is popular tourist destination

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new mexico
Weight: 0.76
, central american country
Weight: 0.69
, nation
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.61
, south america
Weight: 0.60
Siblings san diego
Weight: 0.66
, california
Weight: 0.62
, brazil
Weight: 0.62
, mexico city
Weight: 0.39
, nevada
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular tourist destination 1.00
be important to tourist site 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(mexico, is popular tourist destination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(brazil, is popular tourist destination)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mexico, is popular tourist destination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(brazil, is popular tourist destination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(brazil, is popular tourist destination)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mexico, is popular tourist destination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(mexico, is popular tourist destination)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(mexico, is popular tourist destination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(mexico, be important to tourist site)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(mexico, is popular tourist destination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mexico, be important to tourist site)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mexico, is popular tourist destination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(mexico, be important to tourist site)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(mexico, is popular tourist destination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mexico, be important to tourist site)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(mexico, is popular tourist destination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mexico, is popular tourist destination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(mexico, is popular tourist destination)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mexico, is popular tourist destination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mexico, is popular tourist destination)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(mexico, is popular tourist destination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(brazil, is popular tourist destination)