miami: be good option for lebron

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.67
, hot spot
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.60
, point
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.37
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, cleveland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good option for lebron 1.00
play lsu in dallas 0.77
be hotter than orlando 0.76
play lsu in texas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(miami, be good option for lebron)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(miami, play lsu in texas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(miami, play lsu in dallas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(miami, play lsu in dallas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(miami, play lsu in texas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(miami, play lsu in texas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(miami, play lsu in dallas)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(miami, play lsu in texas)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(miami, be hotter than orlando)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(miami, be hotter than orlando)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(miami, be hotter than orlando)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(miami, be hotter than orlando)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(miami, play lsu in dallas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(miami, be good option for lebron)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(miami, be good option for lebron)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(miami, be good option for lebron)