mica: has physical part cleavage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.71
, silicate
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.60
, flake
Weight: 0.57
, ingredient
Weight: 0.51
Siblings biotite
Weight: 0.57
, muscovite
Weight: 0.51
, tourmaline
Weight: 0.38
, olivine
Weight: 0.37
, quartz
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part cleavage 1.00
have perfect cleavage 0.92
be classified igneous metamorphic hardness luster cleavage etc 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mica, has physical part cleavage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be classified igneous metamorphic hardness luster cleavage etc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mica, has physical part cleavage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(quartz, be classified igneous metamorphic hardness luster cleavage etc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(quartz, be classified igneous metamorphic hardness luster cleavage etc)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mica, has physical part cleavage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(mica, has physical part cleavage)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(mica, has physical part cleavage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mica, have perfect cleavage)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(mica, has physical part cleavage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(mica, have perfect cleavage)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mica, has physical part cleavage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mica, have perfect cleavage)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(mica, has physical part cleavage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mica, have perfect cleavage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(mica, has physical part cleavage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mica, has physical part cleavage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mica, has physical part cleavage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mica, has physical part cleavage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mica, has physical part cleavage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mica, has physical part cleavage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(quartz, be classified igneous metamorphic hardness luster cleavage etc)