mica: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.71
, silicate
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.60
, flake
Weight: 0.57
, ingredient
Weight: 0.51
Siblings biotite
Weight: 0.57
, muscovite
Weight: 0.51
, tourmaline
Weight: 0.38
, olivine
Weight: 0.37
, quartz
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be cheaper than goods 0.77
be more expensive than granite 0.76
be cheaper than manufactured goods 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mica, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(quartz, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mica, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mica, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tourmaline, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mica, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tourmaline, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tourmaline, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mica, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(quartz, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(quartz, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mica, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(quartz, be more expensive than granite)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mica, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(mica, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(mica, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mica, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mica, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mica, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mica, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mica, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mica, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(quartz, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mica, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tourmaline, is expensive)