michael jackson: was influential

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents jackson
Weight: 0.75
, legend
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
, celebrity
Weight: 0.65
Siblings michael
Weight: 0.39
, michael jordan
Weight: 0.38
, adam smith
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was influential 1.00
was famous 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was influential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(michael jordan, was influential)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was influential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(adam smith, was famous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(michael jackson, was influential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(michael jordan, was influential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(michael jordan, was influential)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(michael jackson, was influential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(adam smith, was famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(adam smith, was famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(michael jackson, was influential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(michael jackson, was influential)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(michael jackson, was influential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(michael jackson, was famous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(michael jackson, was influential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(michael jackson, was famous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(michael jackson, was influential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(michael jackson, was famous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(michael jackson, was influential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(michael jackson, was influential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(michael jackson, was influential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was influential)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(michael jackson, was influential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(michael jackson, was influential)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was influential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(michael jordan, was influential)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was influential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(adam smith, was famous)