michael jackson: was successful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents jackson
Weight: 0.75
, legend
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
, celebrity
Weight: 0.65
Siblings michael
Weight: 0.39
, michael jordan
Weight: 0.38
, adam smith
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was successful 1.00
was succesful 0.89
was successfull 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(michael jordan, was successful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(michael jordan, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(michael jordan, was successful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(michael jackson, was successful)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(michael jackson, was succesful)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(michael jackson, was successfull)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(michael jackson, was successfull)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was succesful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(michael jackson, was successfull)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(michael jackson, was succesful)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(michael jackson, was succesful)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was successfull)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was successful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(michael jackson, was successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(michael jordan, was successful)