michael: be j fox doing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.64
, writer
Weight: 0.64
, angel
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings michael jackson
Weight: 0.39
, jesse james
Weight: 0.37
, dylan thomas
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be j fox doing 1.00
was famous j fox 0.95
be j ragusa 0.86
be j foxs health 0.84
be oher doing with ravens 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(michael, be j fox doing)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(michael, be j ragusa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(michael, was famous j fox)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(michael, be j foxs health)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(michael, be j foxs health)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(michael, be j foxs health)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(michael, was famous j fox)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(michael, was famous j fox)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(michael, be j ragusa)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(michael, be j foxs health)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(michael, was famous j fox)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(michael, be j ragusa)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(michael, be oher doing with ravens)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(michael, be oher doing with ravens)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(michael, be oher doing with ravens)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(michael, be oher doing with ravens)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(michael, be j ragusa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(michael, be j fox doing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(michael, be j fox doing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(michael, be j fox doing)