michigan: be in time zone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents university
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.59
, indiana
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.59
Siblings illinois
Weight: 0.59
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, iowa
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in time zone 1.00
be in eastern time zone 0.90
have two time zones 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(indiana, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(michigan, be in time zone)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(indiana, be in eastern time zone)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(michigan, be in time zone)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(indiana, have two time zones)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(michigan, be in time zone)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(indiana, be in time zone)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(indiana, have two time zones)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(indiana, be in eastern time zone)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be in time zone)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be in eastern time zone)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have two time zones)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, have two time zones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(indiana, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(michigan, be in time zone)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(indiana, be in eastern time zone)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(michigan, be in time zone)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(indiana, have two time zones)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(michigan, be in time zone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tennessee, have two time zones)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tennessee, have two time zones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(michigan, be in time zone)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in eastern time zone)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have two time zones)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(michigan, have two time zones)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(michigan, be in eastern time zone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(michigan, be in eastern time zone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(michigan, be in eastern time zone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(michigan, have two time zones)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(michigan, have two time zones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in time zone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(michigan, be in time zone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(indiana, have two time zones)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(indiana, be in time zone)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(indiana, be in eastern time zone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, have two time zones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(indiana, have two time zones)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(indiana, be in time zone)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(michigan, be in time zone)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(indiana, be in eastern time zone)