michigan: be in two parts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents university
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.59
, indiana
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.59
Siblings illinois
Weight: 0.59
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, iowa
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in two parts 1.00
is two parts 0.99
be in 2 parts 0.91
be divided into two parts 0.89
be split in two 0.77
have two time zones 0.76
have two sides 0.76
be divided into regions 0.76
be on eastern time 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(indiana, be on eastern time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(michigan, be in two parts)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(indiana, have two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(michigan, be in two parts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(indiana, have two time zones)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(indiana, be on eastern time)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have two time zones)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be on eastern time)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, have two time zones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(indiana, have two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(michigan, be in two parts)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(indiana, be on eastern time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(michigan, be in two parts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tennessee, have two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tennessee, have two time zones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(michigan, be in two parts)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is two parts)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(michigan, is two parts)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in 2 parts)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(michigan, be in 2 parts)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be divided into two parts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(michigan, is two parts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(michigan, is two parts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(michigan, be in 2 parts)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be split in two)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(michigan, be in 2 parts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have two sides)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have two time zones)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be divided into regions)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(michigan, be on eastern time)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be on eastern time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(michigan, be divided into two parts)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(michigan, be divided into two parts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(michigan, have two time zones)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(michigan, be divided into regions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(michigan, be divided into two parts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(michigan, be divided into regions)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(michigan, be divided into regions)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(michigan, have two sides)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(michigan, be on eastern time)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(michigan, have two time zones)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(michigan, have two sides)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(michigan, have two sides)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(michigan, be on eastern time)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(michigan, have two time zones)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(michigan, be split in two)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(michigan, be split in two)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(michigan, be split in two)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(michigan, be in two parts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(indiana, have two time zones)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(indiana, be on eastern time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, have two time zones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(indiana, have two time zones)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(michigan, be in two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(indiana, be on eastern time)