michigan: has color blue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents university
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.59
, indiana
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.59
Siblings illinois
Weight: 0.59
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, iowa
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color blue 1.00
is blue state 0.88
be go blue 0.87
turn red 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(city, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(michigan, has color blue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(city, has color blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(city, has color blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(illinois, has color blue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is blue state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has color blue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(city, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(michigan, has color blue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(iowa, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(iowa, has color blue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(illinois, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(illinois, has color blue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(illinois, is blue state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(iowa, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(iowa, is blue state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(michigan, has color blue)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(michigan, is blue state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(michigan, be go blue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(michigan, is blue state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(michigan, is blue state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(michigan, turn red)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(michigan, be go blue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(michigan, be go blue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be go blue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(michigan, turn red)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(michigan, turn red)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(michigan, turn red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has color blue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(michigan, has color blue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(city, has color blue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(illinois, is blue state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illinois, has color blue)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(iowa, has color blue)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(iowa, is blue state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(city, has color blue)