michigan: have earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents university
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.59
, indiana
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.59
Siblings illinois
Weight: 0.59
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, iowa
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have earthquakes 1.00
have tornadoes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(indiana, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(michigan, have earthquakes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(michigan, have earthquakes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(indiana, have earthquakes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(indiana, have tornadoes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have earthquakes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have tornadoes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have earthquakes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, have earthquakes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(indiana, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(michigan, have earthquakes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(michigan, have earthquakes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(mexico city, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mexico city, have earthquakes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(illinois, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(illinois, have earthquakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(michigan, have earthquakes)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(michigan, have tornadoes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(michigan, have tornadoes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have tornadoes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(michigan, have tornadoes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(michigan, have earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(indiana, have earthquakes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(indiana, have tornadoes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mexico city, have earthquakes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(illinois, have earthquakes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(indiana, have earthquakes)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(michigan, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(indiana, have tornadoes)