michigan: have tornadoes

Related concepts

Parents	university Weight: 0.60 , school Weight: 0.60 , city Weight: 0.59 , indiana Weight: 0.59 , institution Weight: 0.59
Siblings	illinois Weight: 0.59 , tennessee Weight: 0.35 , iowa Weight: 0.35 , missouri Weight: 0.35 , mexico city Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have tornadoes	1.00
have earthquakes	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(indiana, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(michigan, have tornadoes)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(indiana, have earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(michigan, have tornadoes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(indiana, have tornadoes)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(indiana, have earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(indiana, have tornadoes)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(indiana, have earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(illinois, have earthquakes)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, have earthquakes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(indiana, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(michigan, have tornadoes)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(indiana, have earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(michigan, have tornadoes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(mexico city, have earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(mexico city, have earthquakes)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(illinois, have earthquakes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(illinois, have earthquakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(michigan, have tornadoes)

Similarity expansion

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(michigan, have earthquakes)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

Salient(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(michigan, have earthquakes)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(michigan, have earthquakes)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.21

Typical(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(michigan, have earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Salient(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(michigan, have tornadoes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(michigan, have tornadoes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(indiana, have tornadoes)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(indiana, have earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(mexico city, have earthquakes)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(illinois, have earthquakes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

Typical(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(indiana, have tornadoes)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.21

Typical(michigan, have tornadoes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(indiana, have earthquakes)