michigan: is blue state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents university
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.59
, indiana
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.59
Siblings illinois
Weight: 0.59
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, iowa
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is blue state 1.00
be go blue 0.88
has color blue 0.88
has state state 0.80
turn red 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(city, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(michigan, is blue state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(michigan, is blue state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(city, has color blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(city, has color blue)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is blue state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is blue state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(illinois, has color blue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has color blue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(illinois, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(city, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(michigan, is blue state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(michigan, is blue state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(illinois, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(illinois, is blue state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(iowa, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(iowa, is blue state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(iowa, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(iowa, has color blue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(illinois, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(illinois, has color blue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(illinois, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(illinois, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(michigan, is blue state)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(michigan, has state state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(michigan, has color blue)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(michigan, be go blue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(michigan, has color blue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(michigan, be go blue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(michigan, turn red)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(michigan, be go blue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(michigan, has color blue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(michigan, turn red)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(michigan, turn red)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be go blue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(michigan, turn red)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has color blue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(michigan, is blue state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(city, has color blue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(illinois, is blue state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(iowa, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(iowa, is blue state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illinois, has color blue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(iowa, has color blue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(city, has color blue)