microphone: be at radio studio

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.64
, sound
Weight: 0.63
, instrument
Weight: 0.63
, voice
Weight: 0.63
Siblings camera
Weight: 0.36
, digital camera
Weight: 0.35
, keyboard
Weight: 0.34
, acoustic guitar
Weight: 0.34
, speaker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at radio studio 1.00
be at studio 0.90
be at radio 0.88
be a part of radio 0.86
be at record studio 0.86
be used to listen to radio 0.84
be at tv station 0.79
be at music room 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(voice, be at radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(microphone, be at radio studio)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(voice, be at record studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(microphone, be at radio studio)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(voice, be at record studio)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(voice, be at radio)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at radio)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at record studio)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, be at studio)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speaker, be a part of radio)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(speaker, be used to listen to radio)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, be at music room)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(voice, be at radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(microphone, be at radio studio)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(voice, be at record studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(microphone, be at radio studio)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(speaker, be a part of radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(speaker, be a part of radio)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(speaker, be used to listen to radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(speaker, be used to listen to radio)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(acoustic guitar, be at music room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(acoustic guitar, be at music room)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(acoustic guitar, be at studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(acoustic guitar, be at studio)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(microphone, be at radio studio)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(microphone, be at tv station)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(microphone, be at tv station)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at tv station)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(microphone, be at tv station)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(microphone, be at radio studio)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(voice, be at radio)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(voice, be at record studio)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(speaker, be a part of radio)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(speaker, be used to listen to radio)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, be at studio)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, be at music room)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(voice, be at radio)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(microphone, be at radio studio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(voice, be at record studio)