microphone: be at tv station

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.64
, sound
Weight: 0.63
, instrument
Weight: 0.63
, voice
Weight: 0.63
Siblings camera
Weight: 0.36
, digital camera
Weight: 0.35
, keyboard
Weight: 0.34
, acoustic guitar
Weight: 0.34
, speaker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at tv station 1.00
be at radio 0.79
be at radio studio 0.79
be a part of radio 0.78
be used to listen to radio 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(voice, be at radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(microphone, be at tv station)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(voice, be at radio)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at radio)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speaker, be a part of radio)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(speaker, be used to listen to radio)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(voice, be at radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(microphone, be at tv station)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(speaker, be a part of radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(speaker, be a part of radio)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(speaker, be used to listen to radio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(speaker, be used to listen to radio)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(microphone, be at tv station)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(microphone, be at radio studio)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(microphone, be at radio studio)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(microphone, be at radio studio)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at tv station)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(microphone, be at tv station)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(voice, be at radio)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(speaker, be used to listen to radio)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(speaker, be a part of radio)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(microphone, be at tv station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(voice, be at radio)