microscope: be better than electron microscopes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, organism
Weight: 0.55
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings telescope
Weight: 0.33
, spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.32
, scanner
Weight: 0.32
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.32
, optics
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than electron microscopes 1.00
be different from electron microscopes 0.98
differ from electron microscopes 0.97
defer from electron microscopes 0.94
be better than electron 0.91
differ from electron microscope 0.91
be different from electronic microscopes 0.88
be called compound microscopes 0.86
be necessary for microscopy 0.83
differ in magnification 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microscope, be different from electron microscopes)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(microscope, be different from electron microscopes)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(microscope, differ from electron microscopes)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(microscope, differ from electron microscopes)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(microscope, be different from electron microscopes)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(microscope, differ from electron microscopes)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(microscope, defer from electron microscopes)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(microscope, defer from electron microscopes)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(microscope, be better than electron)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(microscope, differ from electron microscope)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(microscope, be better than electron)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(microscope, defer from electron microscopes)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(microscope, differ from electron microscope)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(microscope, be better than electron)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(microscope, be different from electronic microscopes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(microscope, differ from electron microscope)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(microscope, be different from electronic microscopes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(microscope, be called compound microscopes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(microscope, be called compound microscopes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(microscope, be different from electronic microscopes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(microscope, be called compound microscopes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(microscope, be necessary for microscopy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(microscope, be necessary for microscopy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(microscope, be necessary for microscopy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(microscope, defer from electron microscopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be better than electron)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(microscope, differ in magnification)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(microscope, differ in magnification)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(microscope, differ in magnification)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be different from electron microscopes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(microscope, differ from electron microscopes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(microscope, differ from electron microscope)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be different from electronic microscopes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be called compound microscopes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be necessary for microscopy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microscope, differ in magnification)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(microscope, be better than electron microscopes)