microscope: be considered as tool

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, organism
Weight: 0.55
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings telescope
Weight: 0.33
, spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.32
, scanner
Weight: 0.32
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.32
, optics
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as tool 1.00
be considered as important tool 0.99
be considered as most important tool 0.97
be considered as powerful tool 0.96
be considered as most important tool in biology 0.89
be considered as tool in biology 0.89
be considered as important tool in biology 0.89
be useful tools for scientists 0.79
be useful tools in biology 0.78
be important tool for biologists 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(microscope, be considered as tool)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be considered as powerful tool)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be considered as most important tool in biology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be important tool for biologists)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(microscope, be considered as powerful tool)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(microscope, be considered as powerful tool)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(microscope, be considered as most important tool in biology)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(microscope, be considered as powerful tool)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(microscope, be important tool for biologists)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(microscope, be considered as most important tool in biology)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(microscope, be important tool for biologists)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(microscope, be important tool for biologists)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(microscope, be considered as most important tool in biology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be considered as tool)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(microscope, be considered as tool)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(microscope, be considered as tool)