microscope: be important to doctors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, organism
Weight: 0.55
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings telescope
Weight: 0.33
, spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.32
, scanner
Weight: 0.32
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.32
, optics
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to doctors 1.00
help doctors 0.95
be important in medicine 0.79
be important in field of medicine 0.76
be important to scientists 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be important to scientists)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(telescope, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(telescope, be important to scientists)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(microscope, be important to doctors)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(microscope, help doctors)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(microscope, help doctors)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(microscope, help doctors)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(microscope, be important in field of medicine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(microscope, be important in medicine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(microscope, be important in field of medicine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be important in field of medicine)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(microscope, be important in field of medicine)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(microscope, help doctors)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(microscope, be important to scientists)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(microscope, be important in medicine)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(microscope, be important in medicine)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(microscope, be important to scientists)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(microscope, be important to scientists)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be important in medicine)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be important to scientists)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be important to doctors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(microscope, be important to doctors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be important to doctors)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(telescope, be important to scientists)