microscope: be useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, organism
Weight: 0.55
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings telescope
Weight: 0.33
, spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.32
, scanner
Weight: 0.32
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.32
, optics
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful 1.00
is useful 0.99
be useful in science 0.86
be useful tools for scientists 0.82
be useful tools in biology 0.82
be considered as important tool 0.80
be useful in biology 0.80
be considered as most important tool 0.78
be considered as powerful tool 0.78
be considered as tool 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(technology, be useful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(technology, be useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(technology, be useful in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(optics, is useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(scanner, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(technology, be useful)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(scanner, is useful)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(scanner, is useful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(optics, is useful)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(optics, is useful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(telescope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(telescope, be useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful in science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in biology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(microscope, be considered as tool)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be considered as powerful tool)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(microscope, be considered as tool)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful in biology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(microscope, be considered as powerful tool)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(microscope, be considered as tool)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be considered as tool)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful in biology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(microscope, be considered as powerful tool)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful in science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(microscope, be considered as powerful tool)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful in biology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(technology, be useful in science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(scanner, is useful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(optics, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(telescope, be useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be useful)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(microscope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(technology, be useful in science)