microscope: be useful in science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, organism
Weight: 0.55
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings telescope
Weight: 0.33
, spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.32
, scanner
Weight: 0.32
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.32
, optics
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful in science 1.00
be used in science 0.91
be useful in biology 0.90
be important to life science 0.90
be useful tools in biology 0.88
is useful 0.86
be useful 0.86
be considered as important tool in biology 0.84
be useful tools for scientists 0.84
be considered as most important tool in biology 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful in science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(technology, be useful)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful in science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful in science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(technology, be used in science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(technology, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be used in science)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(optics, is useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(scanner, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(technology, be useful)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(scanner, is useful)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(scanner, is useful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(optics, is useful)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(optics, is useful)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(telescope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(telescope, be useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful in science)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(microscope, be used in science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful in biology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in biology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(microscope, be used in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be important to life science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(microscope, be used in science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(microscope, be important to life science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be used in science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be considered as most important tool in biology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful in biology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(microscope, be considered as most important tool in biology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(microscope, be important to life science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful in biology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(microscope, be important to life science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(microscope, be considered as most important tool in biology)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(microscope, be considered as most important tool in biology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(technology, be useful in science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(technology, be used in science)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(scanner, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(optics, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(telescope, be useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(technology, be useful in science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(technology, be used in science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(microscope, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be useful)